Features
- Cover Type: Hard Cover with 282 pages
- Published by: Harvard Business School Press September 2004
- Written in: English
- ISBN 10 Number: 1591391660
- ISBN 13 Number: 978-1591391661
-
Book Dimensions:
9.3 x 6 x 1.2 inches
- Weighs: 1.3 pounds
From Publishers Weekly
"How," asks Kellerman, "will we ever stop what we refuse to see and study?" Research director of the Center for Public Leadership and lecturer in public policy at
Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, Kellerman focuses in opening chapters on the nature of leadership, the rise of a "leadership industry," the complicit role of followers, the definition of terrible leadership and reasons for its occurrence. Kellerman's style combines the direct prose of the boardroom with the erudition of the classroom; relevant citations abound, from Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes to
Newsweek and
Washington Monthly. Kellerman posits seven "types" of terrible leadership and devotes a chapter containing a few brief examples and one detailed analysis to each. Drawing from the corporate, nonprofit, government and public opinion sectors, she looks at instances of incompetence, rigidity, intemperance, callousness, corruption, insularity and even evil. Her focus isn't limited to individual behavior; context and the actions of followers are also considered. For example, the International Olympic Committee is faulted as much as its former president for scandals and commercialism that have sometimes undermined the games. High-level cabinet members, prominent legislators and the nation as a whole share the blame for the Clinton administration's failure to intervene in Rwanda's genocide. The stories, and Kellerman's final section of correctives, are complex and nuanced; there are no easy answers.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Bound for the top of the business best-sellers lists--at least in terms of the controversy it will generate--
Harvard lecturer Kellerman's book argues cogently, compellingly, and with an amazing clarity for the identification of terrible leadership and, then, for its removal. Too long has the concept of leadership been viewed only in shades of white within America--and, thus, too long have we denied the existence of terrible leadership. Neither are followers excused, for they, too, have a real culpability, asserts Kellerman. Types fall into seven categories, either ineffective or unethical, and include incompetent, rigid, intemperate, callous, corrupt, insular, and evil. And for each, she selects one recent example on which to focus, in addition to minor players, from former Mattel CEO Jill Barad and Reverend Jesse Jackson to Jim Jones and Saddam Hussein. As any good academic problem solver, she lists those corrections necessary for leaders and followers to adopt. The real question is, Will this book be ignored? Hopefully not.
Barbara JacobsCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Reader Reviews
We live in a time where the news is filled with countries, corporations, and other organizations that are failing to perform as they should. Ms. Kellerman has analyzed several of these and identified fundamental seven types of leadership that are prone to failure. INCOMPETENT: The leader and at least some followers lack the will or skill to sustain effective action. RIGID: The leader and at least some of his followers are stiff, unyielding, and unwilling to adapt to new ideas, new information or changing times. Intemperate: The leader lacks self-control and is aided and abetted by followers who do not intervene. CaALLOUS: The leader is uncaring or unkind, he ignores or discounts the needs of the rest of the organization. CORRUPT: These people lie, cheat, or steal. They put self interest above all else. INSULAR: They disregard or at least minimize the health and welfare of those outside the small center group. EVIL: Some leaders and at least some followers commit atrocities. In each of these catagories, she identifies leaders that illustrate her point. This leads to an understanding of why such bad leadership is harmful to the organization, and if the organization is the political leadership of a country, it is bad for the world.
Comment | |
(Report this)