Hackers: Crime in the Digital Sublime

Features

• Cover Type: Paperback with 198 pages
• Published by: Routledge
• Edition: 1st Edition November 3, 1999
• Written in: English
• ISBN 10 Number: 0415180724
• ISBN 13 Number: 978-0415180726
• Book Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.2 x 0.6 inches
• Weighs: 12 ounces

Product Review
Hackers is an interesting and accessible account of this relatively new (in terms of its application to the web) phenomenon.
–TechDirections

his European and sociological insight regarding illegal hackers and hacking culture are fascinating.
–Networker

I wouldhighly recommend this book to anyone in the security field. Taylor's book is the most extensive and detailed examination of the cracker phenomenon I have ever read.
–Information Security

A must-read for anyone who wants to understand the hacking phenomenon that has swept the world..
–Dorothy Denning, Georgetown University



Networker
"his European and sociological insight regarding illegal hackers and hacking culture are fascinating."

Reader Reviews
Author Paul A. Taylor writes about the issues of security breaching between the hacker and the computer security industry in his book Hackers: Crime in the Digital Sublime. Taylor begins the first half of the book giving the definition of a hacker, walking the reader through the evolution of hacking and describing the Hacking culture. His point being, to look past the stereotypical label of hackers being criminals. Using interviews of well-known hackers, in the hacking community, and elite hackers, Taylor provides his audience with a perspective of the positive moral and ethical values most hackers inhibit. This reinforcement helps balance the arguments between the computer underground (hackers) and the computer security industry. The issues that Taylor concentrates on are about hackers' intrusion on big business systems opposed to an individual's personal records. The main argument that consistently appears throughout the book is whether hackers who intrude on big business systems should be punished and how society can determine how they should be punished. Although Taylor leans toward the side of the computer underground, he mediates the arguments throughout the book with a balanced amount of interviews from both sides of the argument. In today's society, Taylor states that cyberspace laws are compared to those that exist in a physical space, the "real world". By providing the point of view of the hacker, Taylor is able to contend that in order to develop a more legitimate law against the intrusion of secured computer systems, society will have to define whether cyberspace is comparable to the real world or if a new set of rules should be developed to aid the regulation of cyberspace. The way in which Taylor structures his book, Hackers: Crime in the Digital Sublime, is comparable to the structure of the MSNBC news program, Hardball with Chris Matthews. During the show Chris Matthews proposes an issue or argument and brings in specialists from each side to debate it. Taylor follows this structure by interviewing people from the computer underground and people from the computer security industry about where laws should be placed or not be placed in cyberspace. Of course, many books have been written giving both sides of an argument, but what separates Taylor's writing from the rest is how the interviews are separated structurally from Taylor's own opinions. The book reminds me of a TV news program transcription. For instance, the interviews are always separated from Taylor's writing by a line space and indented from the left side by five spaces. This structure gave me the feeling that he was not confident enough in writing his argument in his own words or maybe he did not have that much to say about it. Only half of the 176 pages were actually written in his own words. I was very interested to learn about hackers through the eyes of someone who knows some of them personally and favors their point of view, but given his lack of interpretation on the arguments between the underground and security industry, I find him not very convincing. It is apparent that Taylor favors the side of the hackers. Although Taylor equally balances the time spent on each viewpoint, he sometimes uses quotes that make the other side, the computer security industry, seem hostile and unintelligent. For example, Taylor argues about how hackers violate laws and professional codes of ethics but he does not believe that hackers are liars, cheaters, or stealers. His reason being that there are no allegations held against them. After stating that all of the hackers he has met seem to be decent people, he then strings five quotes together about how deviant the computer security industry thinks hackers are. For instance, one quote read, "Somewhere near vermin i.e. possibly unavoidable, maybe even necessary pests that can be destructive and disruptive if not mentioned." (107). This quote is taken out of its original context and put into one of which would persuade his audience to believe his opinion. Taylor does not give the information about what kind of argument the person was having when that statement was made. For all we know this could have been a CEO speaking about a hacker who infiltrated the company's system and did so much damage that it to cost the company millions of dollars to repair. Despite the lack of trust I have for the author, Taylor put together a great understanding of the hacker, the history of hacking, the hacker culture and their motivations. I now denounce the stereotypical negative connotation that the word hacker possesses. The similarities between the book and Hardball would be effective if both parties were given an equal opportunity to share legitimate information about their viewpoint. Unfortunately, since both parties were not presented in the exact space and time like a news show, Taylor is able to edit the information he collected and skew it to benefit his own opinion.