Jesus, Justice, and the Reign of God: A Ministry of Liberation

Features

• Cover Type: Paperback with 316 pages
• Published by: Westminster John Knox Press November 1999
• Written in: English
• ISBN 10 Number: 0664256767
• ISBN 13 Number: 978-0664256760
• Book Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.2 x 0.8 inches
• Weighs: 1.1 pounds

Reader Reviews
Herzog's work combines the best of the scholarship of traditional eschatological images of Jesus and more contemporary research related to the environment of Galilee, first century Judaism, and the circumstances of Roman occupation that is represented by Crossan and co. Many traditional view of Jesus neglect the latter environment with an exclusive focus on the text of the Gospels and neglect the distinct Jewish character of Palestine. Herzog has accomplished an impressive job in addressing both. Herzog presents Jesus as a very Jewish prophet deeply rooted in the Old Testament tradition of justice and righteousness. Seeing himself as a viceroy of God Himself, Jesus envisioned a renewal of the ancient covenantal relationship that had all but disappeared under aristocratic rule, foreign occupation, and the inexorable advance of a monetizing agrarian economy. The innovation of private property rights, heavy taxation, and urbanization had the result of breaking God's original covenant with His people. The people of Palestine, particularly the rural Galilee of Jesus' home were losing their land to powerful elites under the burden of this exploitation and were being reduced to destitution. It is to these people that Jesus announced: "Blessed are you destitute, for yours is the kingdom of God". The Old Testament presents us with a God whose concern is with his people and the prevailing rule of justice and semi-egalitarianism. Extensive provisions are made to care for the poor, to regularly forgive debts, and ensure that all are provided for. The earth did not belong to the people, it belonged to God, and it would bear fruit for the people of Israel provided they kept their covenant with Him. This covenant eroded in time and was replaced with an emphasis on the temple sacrifices, temple tributes, and a focus not on the debt codes that were the heart of the covenant but with the purity codes. To be impure was not to be sinful; everyone was impure at some time. Menstruating women were impure, as were men who had had a nocturnal emission. The leading rulers of the time in Judea had done two things that had violated the covenant: the imposition of the exploitation of temple taxation as a means to provide wealth to Jerusalem, the Romans, and the ruling elites who collaborated with them, and the exchange of the debt codes as the rule of righteousness with the purity codes. This is what Jesus opposed. The temple was not an end, it was a means to an end and the moment it became exploitative and ceased serving the needs of the people it had become illegitimate. The imposition of the purity codes above the debt codes had removed the righteousness and blessing of God away from the people who were poor and had no ability to live up to the Pharisaic purity standards. This is the reason Jesus enacted a symbolic destruction of the temple, as it had become a "den of thieves", and why Jesus is presented as constantly in debate with the rulers of the people regarding purity versus debt. Jesus did not oppose the Torah, he opposed the elitist conception of it; he did not abrogate the Sabbath, he reminded the people that the Sabbath was created for the benefit of the people, not the other way around. Jesus' God was a God of renewal and compassion, who re-established the people in God's covenant and freed them from the bonds of their imperial and religious leaders. His exorcisms and healings were a symbolic breaking of these bonds, demonstrating God's power and teaching them that the debt codes and forgiveness was what the heart of God was concerned with, not purity. This put Jesus on a collision course with the leaders of the people and the Romans. It was a direct criticism of the status quo and a vision of a new kingdom in which God would rule. This teaching, his symbolic act in the temple, his opposition to the payment of tribute to Caesar, and his predictions of a coming kingdom led to his crucifixion. Yes, Jesus opposed the payment to Caesar; as another reviewer has noted, the commentary on this passage is superb. Jesus did not see himself as a king, but his teachings of the kingdom and his eschatological vision led to the charge that he did. This sounds like a "social gospel" of Jesus, in the liberal Protestant tradition. To those who would criticize such an approach, I refer them to the Old Testament and the consistent and constant reference to the covenant, prosperity, and the eternal promise of the fruitfulness of the land for the people of God, not a property-owning minority. This is without a doubt one of the best historical Jesus books you can buy.