Features
- Cover Type: Paperback with 300 pages
- Published by: The MIT Press February 7, 2002
- Written in: English
- ISBN 10 Number: 0262600471
- ISBN 13 Number: 978-0262600477
-
Book Dimensions:
8.9 x 6 x 0.6 inches
- Weighs: 15.5 ounces
Product Review
"Juarrero's lively text skillfully applies the kinds of causal analyses required in non-equilibrium, complex systems theory to the problems of action theory."
—
Stanley N. Salthe, Biological Sciences, Binghamton University
Product Description
What is the difference between a wink and a blink? The answer is important not only to philosophers of mind, for significant moral and legal consequences rest on the distinction between voluntary and involuntary behavior. However, "action theory"—the branch of philosophy that has traditionally articulated the boundaries between action and non-action, and between voluntary and involuntary behavior—has been unable to account for the difference.
Alicia Juarrero argues that a mistaken, 350-year-old model of cause and explanation—one that takes all causes to be of the push-pull, efficient cause sort, and all explanation to be prooflike—underlies contemporary theories of action. Juarrero then proposes a new framework for conceptualizing causes based on complex adaptive systems. Thinking of causes as dynamical constraints makes bottom-up and top-down causal relations, including those involving intentional causes, suddenly tractable. A different logic for explaining actions—as historical narrative, not inference—follows if one adopts this novel approach to long-standing questions of action and responsibility.
Reader Reviews
This review is from: Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System (Hardcover)
I wrote a formal review of this book for the June issue of _Philosophical Psychology_.... Basically, I think this book is a good idea, but poorly executed. Juarrero makes an interesting conncetion between problems in action theory, the branch of philosophy having to do with human action and its place in the world, and information theory. And it is an interesting project to solve some of these traditional problems using modern neuroscience and dynamical systems theory. So I laud the attempt. But no matter how interesting the project, a book has to sink or swim with the details, and Juarrero gets many of them wrong. She misinterprets Donald Davidson's theory of actions as causes, uses mathematical terms such as bifurcation in non-standard ways, and gets the laws of thermodynamics plain wrong. The casual reader may be impressed with her expansive technical vocabulary, but ultimately it detracts from the interesting ideas in the book. Read through the first 200 pages, and you'll realize that the most contentious issues in dynamical systems theory are not even discussed; indeed, Juarrero takes too much of the science for granted. And so, while it's an interesting topic, the book could have used a lot more research and done a lot more "connecting the dots" for readers. If you're after some other books on causality, I would suggest instead Judea Pearl's new book _Causality_. If you are interested in dynamical systems theory, I would read the later works of Andy Clark (such as _Being There_) or some of the papers published by Chris Eliasmith (available on the web). Hope this helps :) --BNT