Features
- Cover Type: Paperback with 288 pages
- Published by: Random House Trade Paperbacks January 30, 2007
- Written in: English
- ISBN 10 Number: 0345494016
- ISBN 13 Number: 978-0345494016
-
Book Dimensions:
7.8 x 5 x 0.7 inches
- Weighs: 8 ounces
Product Review
"Required reading."
—Steven Levitt, author of
Freakonomics"A playful guide to the economics of everyday life, and as such. . . something of an elder sibling to Steven Levitt’s wild child, the hugely successful
Freakonomics."
—
The Economist"A book to savor."
—
The New York Times"
The Undercover Economist is a book you must pick up if you want a fresh perspective on how basic ideas in economics can help in answering the most complex and perplexing questions about the world around us."
—
Business Today
“[Harford] is in every sense consumer-friendly. His chapters come in bite-size sections, with wacky sub-headings. His style is breezy and no-nonsense. . . .
The Undercover Economist is part primer, part consciousness raiser, part self-help manual.” --
Times Literary Supplement"Anyone mystified by how the world works will benefit from this book – especially anyone confused about why good intentions don’t, necessarily, translate into good results."
—
The Daily Telegraph (UK)
"Harford writes like a dream – and is also one of the leading economic thinkers of his generation. From his book I found out why there’s a Starbucks on every corner, what Bob Geldof requirements to learn to make development aid work properly, and how not to get duped in an auction. Reading
The Undercover Economist is like spending an ordinary day wearing X-ray goggles."
—David Bodanis, author of
E=mc2 and
Electric Universe"Popular economics is not an oxymoron, and here is the proof. This book, by the
Financial Times columnist Tim Harford, is as lively and witty an introduction to the supposedly 'dismal science' as you are likely to read."
—
The Times
Product Description
“The economy [isn’t] a bunch of rather dull statistics with names like GDP (gross domestic product),” notes Tim Harford, columnist and regular guest on NPR’s Marketplace, “economics is about who gets what and why.” In this acclaimed and riveting book–part exposé, part user’s manual–the astute and entertaining columnist from the Financial Times demystifies the ways in which money works in the world. From why the coffee in your cup costs so much to why efficiency is not necessarily the answer to ensuring a fair society, from improving health care to curing crosstown traffic–all the dirty little secrets of dollars and cents are delightfully revealed by
The Undercover Economist.
“A rare specimen: a book on economics that will enthrall its readers . . . It brings the power of economics to life.”
–Steven D. Levitt, coauthor of
Freakonomics
“A playful guide to the economics of everyday life, and as such is something of an elder sibling to Steven Levitt’s wild child, the hugely successful Freakonomics.”
–
The Economist“A tour de force . . . If you need to be convinced of the everrelevant and fascinating nature of economics, read this insightful and witty book.”
–Jagdish Bhagwati, author of
In Defense of Globalization
“This is a book to savor.”
–
The New York Times“Harford writes like a dream. From his book I found out why there’s a Starbucks on every corner [and] how not to get duped in an auction. Reading The Undercover Economist is like spending an ordinary day wearing X-ray goggles.”
–David Bodanis, author of
Electric Universe“Much wit and wisdom.”
–The Houston ChronicleFrom
Publishers Weekly Nattily packaged-the cover sports a Roy Lichtensteinesque image of an economist in Dick Tracy garb-and cleverly written, this book applies basic economic theory to such modern phenomena as Starbucks' pricing system and
Microsoft's stock values. While the concepts explored are those encountered in Microeconomics 101, Harford gracefully explains abstruse ideas like pricing along the demand curve and game theory using real world examples without relying on graphs or jargon. The book addresses free market economic theory, but Harford is not a complete apologist for capitalism; he shows how companies from Amazon.com to Whole Foods to Starbucks have gouged consumers through guerrilla pricing techniques and explains the high rents in London (it has more to do with agriculture than one might think). Harford comes down soft on Chinese sweatshops, acknowledging "conditions in factories are terrible," but "sweatshops are better than the horrors that came before them, and a step on the road to something better." Perhaps, but Harford doesn't question whether communism or a capitalist-style industrial revolution are the only two choices available in modern economies. That aside, the book is unequaled in its accessibility and ability to show how free market economic forces affect readers' day-to-day.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From
Bookmarks MagazineHarford exposes the dark underbelly of capitalism in
Undercover Economist. Compared with Steven Levitt’s and Stephen J. Dubner’s popular
Freakonomics (*** July/Aug 2005), the book uses simple, playful examples (written in plain English) to elucidate complex economic theories. Critics agree that the book will grip readers interested in understanding free-market forces but disagree about Harford’s approach. Some thought the author mastered the small ideas while keeping in sight the greater context of globalization; others faulted Harford for failing to criticize certain economic theories and to ground his arguments in political, organizational structures. Either way, his case studies—some entertaining, others indicative of times to come—will make you think twice about that cup of coffee.
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
Reader ReviewsThis is the kind of book any non-fiction writer can envy: a complex subject described with fluidity, wit and confidence. However, the view of economics that you will get from this book is often a bit *too* confident. For example, no distinction is drawn between what's known from empirical research and what's "known" from utterly non-empirical mathematical proofs such as Kenneth Arrow's proof of the efficiency of markets (@ 68-69). Arrow's proof is based on the properties of abstract convex sets, not on those of real-life markets. (You can get the flavor of Arrow's argument by downloading his Nobel lecture.) Moreover, Harford doesn't always integrate the subjects he discusses. Two chapters after discussing Arrow's proof, he spends a chapter discussing the impact of information asymmetries on economics (Ch. 5). But he doesn't mention that one of the achievements of information economics, albeit again accomplished by proofs, is to show that markets are virtually *never* efficient. (Check out the 2001 Nobel lecture of Joseph Stiglitz, esp. @pp. 503-507). Harford also ignores the impact of psychology on economics, which was recognized by the Nobel in 2000. In particular, the empirical work of laureate Daniel Kahneman and his late collaborator Amos Tversky challenges the assumptions of "rationality" that underlie the neoclassical theory that the book so smoothly espouses. (For a popular introduction to the work of Kahneman and Tversky, try Barry Schwartz's excellent "The Paradox of Choice", as well as Kahneman's Nobel lecture.) As other reviewers have noted, the book's justifications for globalization are not its strongest suit. Harford assures us that the "circular flow of currencies" in US trade with other countries "will balance out in the end" (@196), but doesn't factor in the flow of interest the US is paying to its foreign creditors, now that we're again the world's #1 debtor nation. In his glowing discussion of China, he mentions that wages have gone up in the countryside, but omits to say that they have increased at only a fraction of the rate of increase for urban jobs, resulting in heightened income inequality. But aside from a facetious reference to Bill Gates owning everything (@66), you won't find any discussion about income inequality in this book, much less about whether "free market"-type reforms play a role in enhancing it. And when Harford glibly describes Chinese textile workers as "selfishly" looking for the best jobs (@77), he omits to mention that often they're looking for jobs in order to support the education or health care of family members back home. And how free are most labor markets anyway: consider whether you'd "selfishly" dump your current job if no one would give you a recommendation for your next one -- or for a more Chinese example, if your employer promised you he'd pay you your back wages sometime in the future, and suing him was not an option. His remark is more apt, if at all, only for the most highly-educated and fluid segments of the labor market in certain areas, such as software engineers in the Shanghai region. I was scribbling my disagreement with the author in the margins of many pages of this book. But for his expository skill, I have only admiration. My rating reflects a compromise between style (5 stars) and substance (a bit less than 2 stars). For a slightly drier, but much more balanced and informative book covering a lot of the same subject matter, try "Reinventing the Bazaar" by the late John McMillan.